When I visited Ireland in late 1990s, everywhere one turned there were signs saying “funded by the EU”: from new roads to broadband internet in remote communities.
And this was the deal that Poland signed up to: that by coming in line with EU beliefs and structures they would get massive investment. But it hasn't happened. Then the economic crisis struck and the money that might have come to the poorer corners of Europe is needed to balance the books. Furthermore, although Europe has expanded, the fundamentally rich countries has not expanded: Germany, France, the UK, BeNeLux, Scandinavia remain the majority funders. There are more States justly pulling on a resource and funding which is no bigger.
So Poland has not had the funds that they could have expected. Unlike my trip to Croatia, there are not EU flags everywhere but there are prices in Euros fairly regularly. This is a country wanting to commit to Europe but which has been denied full privileges of the club.
This poses a challenge on how the EU holds together where countries are not getting quite what they expected but are still getting the kudos of being in the EU. Poland has positioned itself to be politically and culturally EU-facing – from its architecture and politics to its history and culture selections. But how long can that continue without the money they hoped for? How long can socio-cultural union mean the economics are overlooked? Poland may lead the way in a new type of Europe to get the deal it hoped for.
No comments:
Post a Comment